Free Checking On the Way Out: Who Should Pay?

Advertiser Disclosure This article/post contains references to products or services from one or more of our advertisers or partners. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products or services.
Last updated on July 23, 2019 Comments: 10

July 1 and August 15 are the dates consumers need to worry about. New Fed rules for bank accounts go into effect on July 1 for anyone who opens a new bank account, while current account holders should know about changes to their accounts starting August 15.

On these dates, the Federal Reserve is limiting the ability for banks to collect fees from their customers through overdraft fees, a popular income source for banks and an unpopular nuisance for account holders. In the old system, the cost of offering free products was subsidized by the small percentage of customers paying overdraft fees.

Will I do believe it is good that overdraft fees, a penalty that targets whether by design or by practice the least wealthy customers, are placed behind an opt-in barrier, it leaves the banks with two strategies, both which will likely adversely effect customers who otherwise are good citizens and can skate by without paying fees.

First, the banks will enhance their marketing approach in order to convince customers that they want overdraft protection. For new account holders this is easy. A financial associate (salesperson) at a bank can ask the new account holder in person, selling the benefits of overdraft protection while downplaying the fee. For those who apply for an account online, the bank can bury the fee in an unrelated location on the website, separating the fee from the action in the applicant’s mind.

For current customers, banks can give their overdraft protection a fancy name like TD Debit Card Advance and send marketing materials through mail, email, phone, and text message, encouraging the account holders to allow the $35 fee.

Second, services for which we have grown used to accessing for free will no longer be so. I’ve managed to pay almost no banking fees for the last decade. Almost every fee I did pay in a savings or checking account was reversed. That has become more difficult in the past few years. Some of the accounts I prefer, particularly those with brick and mortar institutions like Wachovia, require minimum balances across all my accounts held there.

I expect that towards the end of the summer, banks will begin discontinuing many of their free products. Free checking will certainly be among the first of the most popular services to gradually disappear. The most popular programs across many banks, free checking for students and free checking for seniors, may be the last to go as we see free services for average, middle-class customers decrease.

Senator Chuck Schumer has already urged the Federal Reserve to ensure banks don’t penalize customers as they seek additional revenue when the cash cow of overdraft fees disappears. It’s unlikely the Fed will stop banks from adding new fees, some we may not have considered in the past. The banking industry will take a page from the airline industry’s handbook, in which every additional service has a cost to the consumer above and beyond the fare.

Like we are charged for meals on flights, banks may charge us for a monthly paper statement. Like we are charged for baggage, banks may charge us for viewing images of cleared checks. Like we are charged for changing our flight itinerary, banks may charge us for visiting a teller in person. Airlines charge us for cashing in our miles for “free” rewards, and banks may charge us for automatic bill payment services.

Perhaps banks are justified in charging account fees rather than offering free accounts. Shouldn’t a customer pay for his own service rather than expect another customer (such as one who pays overdraft fees) to subsidize the cost of operating that account?

Article comments

Tom says:

Hi Everyone. I’m just putting some feelers out there to see if there’s anyone interested in making a pretty substantial amount of cash in a short amount of time. Only thing this requires is that you have an active bank account or credit card. No cash is required up front to start. Which means your account can be on a zero balance and that’s completely fine.Text +1(314) 856 1730, lets talk about the next deal

Anonymous says:

Alot of banks have already started charging for outbound ACH transfers. I have 3 banks that never charged for that in the past and in the last month have started charging between $3-$5 per transfer now.

Anonymous says:

It will be interesting to see how things will change after these dates have passed. I used to have free over draft protection then a couple of months ago my bank choose to remove that free offer. I didn’t realize how much I used it until I got slammed with 3 over draft fees in one day. Definitely going to be using their new free online alerts to keep better track of my money from now on. But still a general bummer overall.

Anonymous says:

You can’t ask a non-government agency/company to give up billions without reacting in appropriately. If they were to do otherwise they could be liable to shareholders.

What kills me about Schumer was the fact that the very real fact above didn’t seem to even cross his mind as he and others in Congress paraded the CARD act.

Luke Landes says:

Well in this case, Schumer is playing the role of consumer advocate, not banking industry advocate, so I wouldn’t expect him to consider P&L.

Anonymous says:

What role he is playing shouldn’t blind him to (or justify) ignoring the concepts of capitalism, and basic critical thinking regarding what unintended consequences may this move have

Anonymous says:

The act does not dictate what services should cost nor mandate that they be offered. All it does it outlaw some specific practices that are consumer-unfriendly and/or confusing to the average consumer.

Anonymous says:

You forgot a few words in the title – “Speculation that…” We were told when the CARD act passed that free credit cards would be going away, and annual fees would return. There have certainly been repercussions of that act, but there are still plenty of cards available with no annual fee. I don’t see any evidence that checking accounts will be any different.

Luke Landes says:

It is true that there are many credit cards still available without annual fees, but there are many more ways for banks to recoup lost fees with credit cards than there are with checking accounts; namely through the increase of credit card interest rates. That’s not the case with checking accounts.It is speculation, but I’m not alone.

Anonymous says:

Overdraft fees are completely voluntary, I never understood why pols
are so hot to eliminate them. Well, besides buying votes, that is, by
eliminating any inconvenience to the most stupid of bank customers, those who
depend on a $35.00 reminder to tell them they have no money left. I’ll bank where
it costs me the least, and if free checking disappears, I’ll probably look for a way
to stop using checks. I won’t spend where I don’t need to.